Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: james anderson <James.Anderson@mecomnet.de>
- To: XML Developers' List <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 17:25:01 +0200
i would actually prefer to have the option requesting that names be parsed to
interned symbols. symbols without uri are simply in a package either without a
name, or with a constant default name.
this mechanism also offers numerous advantages. for example, giving the
package more than one name, or constructing and using packages
programmatically while delaying binding to the uri. a consequence of which is
that it would be trivial to shifting the uri systematically for compiled applications...
David Megginson wrote:
> I have just heard a good argument for using the
> syntax for compound names rather than the
> "URIpart localpart"
> ... What does everyone else think?
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)