Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk>
- To: XML-Dev Mailing list <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 18:11:27 +0100 (BST)
On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, Jonathan Borden wrote:
> Murray Maloney wrote:
> >At 02:46 PM 6/16/99 +0200, Ronald Bourret wrote:
> >>My apologies for the sarcasm, but although I find the use of namespace
> >>to find schemas a wonderful theoretical idea, I'm having more than a
> >>trouble seeing how it could possibly work in practice.
> >Come work with Commerce One and we'll show you.
> There is no doubt in my mind that using the namespace URI can work in
> many circumstances to locate a schema. There is also no doubt in my mind
> that a PI containing an href can also be used to locate a schema. The issue
> ought not be what has been done in pre-spec implementations rather what is
> the best way to do this for the future. The problem with using the namespace
> URI is that
> 1) it identifies a single resource
...which might have multiple content-negotiable manifestations (each of
which is a resource too), much as normal Web resources can manifest
themselves in HTML,PDF,GIF,PNG (or, closer to the point) in different
lanuages (fr,en etc) as a normal part of the dereferencing business.
> 2) the location and protocol used to access the resource is hardcoded into
'a' not 'the'; possiblity of other access mechanisms for getting at
(content/language negotiated bytestream manifestations of the) resource
isn't ruled out. And is only hardcoded with certain URI schemes.
> the namespace and hence cannot be changed without causing fundamental
> changes to the structure of the entire document.
> 3) mechanisms to resolve URIs which are location and protocol indenpendent
> (e.g. "urn:xxx") are not widely available and hence cannot be used in
This is just more (meta)data, and XML is as good a mechanism as any for
shipping about such stuff. We don't need to wait for global
infrastructure before exchanging such modest facts as 'uri:xxx:doc444'
[...instance data using the 'abc' vocab here...]
[accompanied perhaps by data about resolving the URI naming 'abc'...]
Sure, the terminology to exchange this resolution needs to be nailed
down, but the point is that what we lack is not a URN resolution
_mechanism_ being widely deployed, but a bit of terminology for thinking
how to exchange this URN2URL-ish information. Which by contrast doesn't
seem so hard...
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)