OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   Re: Nested DTDs

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
  • To: "Richard L. Goerwitz" <richard@goon.stg.brown.edu>, xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
  • Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 08:53:39 -0700

At 10:30 AM 6/18/99 -0400, Richard L. Goerwitz wrote:
>I'm always wondering why all this "for interoperability" language is
>in the spec.  It's hard to know what weight to assign something that's
>neither legal nor illegal - or something that's technically valid, but
>discouraged in some usage contexts that aren't very clearly defined in
>the spec.

When XML was created, there was no XML software, but there was a considerable
array of existing SGML software.  If you follow all the for-interoperability
rules, your XML docs should work just fine with pre-1996 SGML software.
That's all.  I *think* that's what the spec says:

for interoperability 
      [Definition:] A non-binding recommendation included to increase the 
      chances that XML documents can be processed by the existing installed 
      base of SGML processors which predate the WebSGML Adaptations Annex to 
      ISO 8879. 


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS