Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Paul Prescod <email@example.com>
- To: David Brownell <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 14:58:56 -0400
David Brownell wrote:
> Yes. I'll commend you to some archives at the OMG for this topic;
> I recall something like a four year ongoing discussion about the
> notion of identity, which concluded that there are enough different
> notions that picking one to use everywhere was wholly impractical.
I find this hard to believe. Are you saying that in the OMG universe I can
have two references to an object and there is *no way* of asking if they
refer to the same object?
> (So if folk on this list are confused by the notion of "identity",
> it's understandable and you're in fine company. It's not at all a
> simple notion.)
I'm not so concerned about the folks on this list as the folks who are
writing specs. They write as if the concept of identity were well-defined
in the Web context (see, e.g. RDF and XLink) when clearly it is not.
Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
[Woody Allen on Hollywood in "Annie Hall"]
Annie: "It's so clean down here."
Woody: "That's because they don't throw their garbage away. They make
it into television shows."
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)