[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Marc.McDonald@Design-Intelligence.com
- To: paul@prescod.net
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 18:30:19 -0700
I read 'not required to' as 'can't be guaranteed to', therefore I can't
assume there will be data I can use to do an equality of content check
against.
If I design a system that assumes URIs refer to data in order to work, I
have violated the 'not required' rule. You always have to design for the
worst case.
Read it as 'can't assume there is any data referred to' so only the URI text
can be used to establish identity of 2 URIs.
Marc B McDonald
Principal Software Scientist
Design Intelligence, Inc
www.design-intelligence.com <http://www.design-intelligence.com>
----------
From: Paul Prescod [SMTP:paul@prescod.net]
Sent: Monday, June 21, 1999 5:07 PM
To: Marc McDonald
Subject: Re: Web Resource Identity
Marc.McDonald@Design-Intelligence.com wrote:
>
> With URIs, since they do not refer to any data,
That is absolutely not true. URIs can refer to data just as URLs
can. URIs
are not *required* to refer to data, but they can.
--
Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only
himself
http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco
[Woody Allen on Hollywood in "Annie Hall"]
Annie: "It's so clean down here."
Woody: "That's because they don't throw their garbage away. They
make
it into television shows."
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|