Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Ketil Z Malde <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: 22 Jun 1999 10:45:35 +0200
David Brownell <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> Are of a fundamentally different character. It is not a simply case
>> of having more or less information. In the second example, even the
>> structure of the information you are entitled to (and this from the
>> owner's viewpoint) has been lost, and gratuitously so.
> On what grounds can you claim "you" are "entitled" to such information?
On the grounds that it was published to "you" on the web or otherwise?
Come on, whether "you" have legal access to data is completely
irrelevant to how it should be marked up. Are you seriously trying to
argue that information publishers should use markup to make data as
useless as possible, from the viewpoint that information consumers are
probably accessing it illegally?
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)