Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Francis Norton <email@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 22:55:13 +0100
I'm losing track of who is on which side in this debate, but...
"Simon St.Laurent" wrote:
> At 07:38 AM 6/22/99 -0400, Paul Prescod wrote:
> >But if you are going to pursue this "disabling the semantic web" stuff
> >you'll have to show that XSL is somehow better at doing so than the DOM,
> >which you seem to think is just fine.
> Sure thing. XSL provides a semantic-free vocabulary for representing
> content. The DOM just juggles tree structures. CSS just annotates those
> structures for presentation. XSL provides a quick path from semantic
> documents to semantic-free presentation that is _possible_ in DOM+CSS, but
> is neither easy nor recommended.
... how about advertising-funded info-sources as an example of data that
should be presented in as non-machine-semantic (if you'll forgive the
neoligism) a form as possible?
Until or unless we have an ethical model that allows meta-search engines
and meta-price feeds to promise to pass on the adverts as well as the
data, the survival of these handy services may depend partly on their
output have a low level of machine semantics.
Air Rage - a "flight *and* fight" reaction?
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)