[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 14:24:53 -0400 (EDT)
Tim Bray writes:
> I disagree. We went through this quite a bit in the XML Syntax
> Working Group. It is absolutely *not* the case that DTD parsing is
> demonstrably very expensive.
It added only a tiny handful of private methods to AElfred (which is a
recursive-descent parser). Tim's Lark is, a think, a finite state
machine, so I'll take his word for it that there was no significant
bloat there either.
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|