OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

 


 

   RE: Unix/Java design issues (Was: Re: Is CDATA "structure"?)

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]
  • From: Blair Murri <BMurri@wavephore.net>
  • To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
  • Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 13:12:21 -0600

Title: RE: Unix/Java design issues (Was: Re: Is CDATA "structure"?)

    -----Original Message-----
    From:   Hunter, David [SMTP:dhunter@Mobility.com]
    Sent:   Wednesday, July 21, 1999 12:48 PM
    To:     xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
    Subject:        RE: Unix/Java design issues (Was: Re: Is CDATA "structure"?)

    Windows NT is perfectly Unicode aware, and I routinely view XML documents in
    Notepad on my NT box.  All of the characters are fine, with the only problem
    being the LF-CRLF-CR problem that started this thread in the first place.  I
    am 87% sure that Windows 95 uses the windows-1250 or windows-1252 character
    set internally, although it may also have some level of Unicode awareness.
    (I'm not sure about that.)  And I haven't the faintest idea what character
    set Windows 98 uses natively, although I'd like to hope that it's Unicode.

    Windows 98 is like Windows 95, but here is the kicker -- both can convert from the codepage that they are setup with to/from unicode.  This is significant because COM on Win9x as well as NT is *ALL* unicode internally (thus, MS's DOM (being a COM object) does everything internally in unicode all the time (although I must plead ignorance as to its usage of the LF-CRLF-CR thing that this thread is about).

Blair L. Murri
Sr. Programmer/etc.
WavePhore, Inc.





 

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS