[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
- To: 'Don Park' <donpark@quake.net>, xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 10:31:46 +0100
Don Park wrote:
> > document - you just pass a 'sub-set' of the schema (which is still
> > itself a valid schema).
>
> Thus we end up with "XML Schema Fragment" (XML Schema + XML
> Fragment). Has
> anyone actually tried doing this? I am interested in knowing
> any serious
> issues.
Er ... no you don't. (It might be worth revisiting the raging debate
about fragments from a few months ago.) The technique I have used means
it is always a complete schema, if it only represents a sub-set of some
larger schema.
Regards,
Mark
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
