[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- To: <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 10:19:56 -0400 (EDT)
Didier PH Martin writes:
> Didier says:
> And this notation is location independent and protocol agnostic. Also, has
> been the result of this community work. http based name space reference make
> sense only if it points to a resource. http is a resource access protocol,
> hname is a name reference. it is therefore more logical to use hname than
> http. Otherwise why not use postal code instead :-))). So James, I too use
> hname and still support you, Paul and others to do so. Thanks James for your
> good common sense.
It wouldn't hurt, I guess, to use hname for experimental pieces like
airports.rdf, but I cannot in good conscience recommend it to my
customers for real implementations until it gets IETF sanction;
otherwise, it's not guaranteed unique (other parties might use it for
other purposes).
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|