Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "DuCharme, Robert" <DuCharmR@moodys.com>
- To: "'Tom Otvos'" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "'email@example.com'" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 10:02:34 -0400
>When specifying the URI for an external DTD in the DOCTYPE declaration, is
>it generally accepted that a network-accessible document should be
>specified, or a local one? I often see examples where the URI is
><http://...> , but I find it hard to imagine that *every time* a particular
>XML file is parsed by a validating parser, the DTD is downloaded from some
>remote web server. The XML spec does not seem to talk about this, but is
>there some search algorithm that allows a remote URI to be overridden by a
>local file, if it exists?
As far as I know, relative URIs of the form
<!DOCTYPE foo SYSTEM "foo.dtd">
(or some other relative path like "../dtds/foo.dtd") is more common than
using remote DTDs, although this may be changing. The beauty of allowing
relative URIs is that it makes it all backward-compatible with the SGML way,
in which URIs were not an issue.
In XML terms, the above example points to a relative URI that is in the same
directory as the document, so if the document is local, the DTD is assumed
to be as well.
Bob DuCharme www.snee.com/bob <bob@
snee.com> see www.snee.com/bob/xmlann for "XML:
The Annotated Specification" from Prentice Hall.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)