Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <email@example.com>
- To: David Megginson <firstname.lastname@example.org>, XML-Dev Mailing list <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 18:00:03 -0400
At 05:23 PM 8/9/99 -0400, David Megginson wrote:
>For now, it's safest to think of Namespaces as an application layer on
>top of XML rather than part of XML itself.
I don't mind doing that; my main concern is that there is no specified
behavior for that layer. I think we can make things up that sound
reasonable, but we're making things up.
>In fact, that distinction probably won't last for long -- the current
>public XSL and Infoset working drafts, to give only two of many
>possible examples, treat Namespaces as an integral part of XML, and if
>there ever is an XML 1.1 or an XML 2.0, I'd be surprised not to see
>Namespaces in it (together with Infoset).
That might finally clear up some of the harder problems...
I've concluded that namespaces itself is a great idea. I've also concluded
that integrating it with XML 1.0 in any reliable way is pretty much
impossible. So anything that gives that integration a good hard look and
knocks it together is a great idea, even if it does put my books out of date.
XML: A Primer (2nd Ed - September)
Building XML Applications
Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical
Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)