[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
- To: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>, xml-dev <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 11:14:32 -0400
At 10:26 AM 8/29/99 -0400, Ann Navarro wrote:
>No, we've not confused them. We happen to have three 'flavors' of XHTML
>1.0 (the first deliverable from the XHTML project, not the end sum of our
>work), that essentially map to the three flavors of HTML 4.0. Each of them
>was assigned a namespace that corresponds in title to the three flavor
>names. We do not mistakenly confuse their DTDs for their namespaces. (nor
>are we limiting XHTML to the use of DTDs, Schemas, as has been pointed
>out, 'isn't soup yet')
I should clarify myself here. Yes, the XHTML 1.0 PR does say a conforming
document must validate against one of the three DTDs.
I certainly recognize that schemas or other defining mechanisms may also
play into our future work.
Ann
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|