Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: David Megginson <email@example.com>
- To: XMLDev list <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 15:55:12 -0400 (EDT)
Ann Navarro writes:
> Did HTML 4.0 -- with it's three versions, fail from overcomplexity?
Sorry to be harsh, but I almost never see the required HTML 4.0
DOCTYPE declaration at the top of Web pages and I know of no
widely-deployed HTML user agent that actually tries to distinguish
HTML 4.0 from HTML 3.* and do something useful based on that
distinction (much less one that distinguishes the transitional and
Certainly, the improved documentation was welcome, and HTML 4.0 was a
brave attempt to codify and direct what was already industry practice.
However, most specs will fail, just as most tadpoles will be eaten --
it's sad (and frustrating for those of us who volunteer so much time
to help develop them), but that's the way it works.
All the best,
David Megginson email@example.com
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)