Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "Braden N . McDaniel" <email@example.com>
- To: Ann Navarro <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 16:36:18 -0400
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999 14:58:50 Ann Navarro wrote:
> At 02:43 PM 8/29/99 -0400, David Megginson wrote:
> >(and I think that Tim's throw-away number was, if anything, a gross
> >underestimate -- I cannot imagine even 1 in 1000 processes caring
> >about the difference between transitional and strict)
> >You and I, Paul have seen too many worthy specs fail completely
> >because of superfluous complexity -- HyTime, Topic Maps, and DSSSL
> >(and Architectural Forms) spring immediately to mind, but they hardly
> >stand alone. Most specs fail anyway, complex or not (XML's success is
> >the exception rather than the rule), but it would be nice to give
> >XHTML at least a fighting chance.
> Did HTML 4.0 -- with it's three versions, fail from overcomplexity?
Definitely. Or, which HTML 4.0-conforming browsers did you have in mind?
Certainly HTML has succeeded, but HTML 4.0 just isn't a reality on the Web yet. I don't consider that successful.
Braden N. McDaniel
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)