Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "Braden N . McDaniel" <email@example.com>
- To: Ann Navarro <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 17:50:46 -0400
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999 17:27:42 Ann Navarro wrote:
> At 05:22 PM 8/29/99 -0400, Braden N . McDaniel wrote:
> >Creating an HTML 4.0 document that will be butchered by today's browsers
> >is a snap. There are elements that remain unrecognized in the popular
> >browsers. EMBED, which is part of no HTML spec, remains more popular on
> >the Web than OBJECT simply because it works better. That's how it's less a
> >reality than HTML 3.2.
> If you have to reach for EMBED and OBJECT for examples, I can't by any
> stretch call this a failure.
Citing a tag as commonly used as EMBED isn't a reach by any means. The lack of a W3C-specified alternative with working implementations is a significant failure. But you want more examples?
ABBR isn't recognized. Q isn't handled correctly. THEAD, TFOOT, TBODY, COL, and COLGROUP are only available in IE, among the popular browsers.
> Nearly the entire HWG site is written in valid HTML 4.0 (and CSS) and it
> doesn't fail at all (www.hwg.org)
And just how many constructions does it use that don't also appear in HTML 3.2?
> It can be done, and it's not at all hard.
Not the issue. The issue is that it's far too easy to create HTML 4 documents that *don't* display correctly in current browsers.
Braden N. McDaniel
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)