[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@jtauber.com>
- To: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@capella.co.il>, "XMLDev list" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 21:07:49 +0800
> That's well and good, but we can't wait until the XSchema recommendation
is
> finalized. XHTML is due to be finalized much earlier, and as we've seen it
> depends on what the decision in XSchema will be. I don't know how the W3C
> process handles such a conflict. What will happen if XHTML makes a
decision,
> and the XSchema draft then changes so it no longer makes sense?
Which is one reason why I think XHTML should perhaps go with zero namespaces
for now and the W3C should address the broader issue ASAP. Although, it
could be said that the W3C *has* addressed the issue and he has already made
his mind up :-)
James
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|