[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Don Park" <donpark@docuverse.com>
- To: "'XMLDev list'" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 23:49:00 -0700
Rick,
I completely agree with your conclusion. DTD sucks, XML-Schema is only
marginally better, we need something more flexible. You might be interested
in reading an interesting paper Dave Raggett (the HTML 4.0, Tidy guy) wrote
that includes your 'parent model' idea. The paper is at:
http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett/dtdgen/Docs/
I wouldn't mind having this 'Assertion Grammars' replace the current
XML-Schema proposal. Frankly, I am tired of tip-toeing around what W3C
thinks is the right way of doing things.
I had a great time reading it and I am sure it will definitely shake some of
you up. It is a must read for everyone.
Best,
Don Park - mailto:donpark@docuverse.com
Docuverse - http://www.docuverse.com
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
