[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Matthew Gertner <matthew@praxis.cz>
- To: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- Date: Mon, 06 Sep 1999 19:05:47 +0200
> But what would it discover? Stylesheets can already tell you how
> <foo> should be rendered in a browser. What other kind of information
> could reasonably be discovered in the general case besides structural
> validation rules and possibly simple data-typing? Neither of those is
> going to tell my application much about <foo> if it doesn't know about
> <foo> already.
Wasn't this exactly the point of Jon Bosak's by-now-classic paper about XML and Java? Maybe
this has been generally written off as shameless promotion of Sun's interests, but if so this
seems like a shame to me, since the idea is absolutely brilliant. There should be a way to
associate tags with Java classes (and preferably a generic mechanism that at least opens up
the possibility of associating them with code of any kind). The class in question could be
determined in a number of ways (stylesheet, schema, whatever) and would then consume the
contents of the element, doing something useful. The nice thing about general-purpose
programming languages is that this something could be absolutely anything.
Matthew
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|