[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
- To: <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 13:30:09 +0800
>On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Matthew Gertner wrote:
>
>> No one objected to the W3C controlling XML at the onset because it
was
>> far from a foregone conclusion that XML was win over a number of
>> plausible (but in retrospect clearly inferior) approaches. Now XML is
>> mainstream and this no longer flies.
> > Lack of complete buyin (not to mention open hostility) from XML
> >developers is certainly not in the W3C's interest, and only opens
the
> > way for Microsoft and other major players to step in with their own
> > proprietary (and inevitably less well thought out) approaches.
I disagree on both counts. Firstly, W3C does not control XML to the
extent that they can control other syntaxes, because XML is SGML.
Secondly, I think that if Microsoft made a successor to XML, it is quite
possible it could be better than XML is, learning from experience. If
Microsoft cares to give me a million dollars, I am prepared to develop
such a thing!
Rick Jelliffe
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
