Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: John Cowan <email@example.com>
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 14:57:51 -0400 (EDT)
> In my mind it's not much more than a more rigorous definition of the XML
> data model, with the potential application to other data models. Maybe
> what we need is something between DOM and full-fledged groves. Just as
> XML is taking off as a simpler version of SGML, how about a simplified
> version of groves?
That is just what the XML Infoset WD is all about. There is no problem
with expressing the XML Infoset as a grove, and the only reason it
isn't going to be in the WD is that I don't know how. I do know how
to do RDF schemas, so there will be one of those instead.
AFAIK the Infoset meets the grove object model: there are objecdts with
properties, some string-, integer-, or boolean-valued; other properties
are either ordered or unordered lists of other objects.
Does the grove model capture the difference between ordered and
unordered lists directly, or does that require extra properties?
John Cowan email@example.com
I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)