[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@microsoft.com>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 17:31:01 -0700
Right. An unqualified attribute name is resolved against the per-element
namespace, not against the "default" namespace, if any.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@textuality.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 1999 6:56 PM
To: Joe Lapp; xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Subject: Re: namespace of attributes?
At 09:12 PM 9/12/99 -0400, Joe Lapp wrote:
>I believe 5.3 and A.2 are both correct and consistent with each other,
>although I have to admit that the spec originally gave me trouble too. My
>conclusion was that it is *not* possible to put an attribute in the default
>namespace. An attribute goes in the per-element namespace unless the
>attribute explicity has a prefix that assigns it a namespace.
I think Joe is correct. -Tim
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN
981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following
message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
