[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 13:29:46 -0400 (EDT)
Blunderingly I wrote:
> I have been investigating the class of Extenders with a view to a
> second part to my XML/Unicoded-3.0 proposal. I find that three
> characters which Unicode classifies as extenders were mysteriously
> omitted from the XML category:
Please ignore this whole posting: it was the result of a bug in my
investigative scripts.
The upshot is that I have now looked at the Unicode 3.0 property
lists, and they don't add anything new. My previous proposal stands.
However, the rationale for the fifth rule in Appendix B has now
gone away, and these characters should be treated as backward-compatibility
exceptions: they are of type Lm but are considered name-start characters.
--
John Cowan cowan@ccil.org
I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
