[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
- To: "'Daniel Veillard'" <Daniel.Veillard@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 08:28:59 -0700
"Hunter, David" wrote:
>
> From: Daniel Veillard [mailto:Daniel.Veillard@w3.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 1999 5:14 AM
>
> <snip/>
> > I guess Ann
> > and other members of that working group did explain the reasons of
> > their technical decision.
> <snip/>
>
> Let me just echo Simon St. Laurent:
>
> No. We have no reason. We have nothing.
Aye -- nothing. An "official" W3C rationale is still lacking;
odd since this decision seems to fly in the face of the clear
intent of the XML namespaces spec.
"A html:rose is a strict:rose is a frameset:rose ... "
- Dave
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
