[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
- To: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>, "XML-DEV" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 13:43:13 -0400
At 01:29 AM 9/17/99 +0800, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
>But HTML 4.0 does not define three namespaces. T
<snip>
>In any case, since HTML 4.0 was finished before the namespace spec
>(1997-12-18 v. 1999-01-14)
You've answered your own question there.
>It seems clear that the HTML team have some mental concept of namespaces
>which exists independently of what the W3C specification actually
>allows.
There's no basis for that other than assumption.
The HTML WG doesn't live in a cave, nor an alternate reality. By the
conversations *here* it's clear that the community at large doesn't agree
on the value and application of namespaces. That doesn't follow then, that
the HTML WG simply can't read a spec or understand the obvious. :)
Ann
---
Author of Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials
Coming in September --- Mastering XML
Founder, WebGeek Communications http://www.webgeek.com
Vice President-Finance, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org
Director, HWG Online Education http://www.hwg.org/services/classes
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|