[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- To: Andrew Layman <andrewl@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 21:04:20 -0400
At 03:05 PM 9/16/99 -0700, Andrew Layman wrote:
>A little more courtesy should be extended to the members of the HTML WG.
Could you please let us know precisely what it is that you're objecting to?
A number of W3C-affiliated folks are griping, but, to be honest, I don't
see any discourtesy, just a large number of serious questions. (Your
message didn't cite any examples.) If anything, I see W3C folk turning back
serious questions with personal reactions and overstated rhetoric that
borders on contempt and ridicule.
While it is unfortunate that a seemingly large number of XML-dev folk
disagree with the work of the HTML WG, I don't see much flamethrowing going
on. Some folks may interpret disagreement as personal attacks, but I can't
see I've seen cause for that lately.
Just curious,
Simon St.Laurent
XML: A Primer (2nd Ed - September)
Building XML Applications
Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical
Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies
http://www.simonstl.com
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|