[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 05:52:58 -0400 (EDT)
Ann Navarro writes:
> >but I don't imagine that DMOZ or RPMFind will be
> >able to become conformant any time soon because they have extremely
> >large user bases with the old Namespace URI hard-coded in their
> >software.
>
> In all objectiveness, isn't that more a problem of it being "hard
> coded" than of a change in URI?
That's the whole point of this discussion: Namespace URIs are
necessarily hard-coded in documents and applications. That's why many
of us want exactly one, persistent XHTML Namespace URI.
In this case, DMOZ and RPMFind did hard-code the Namespace URI before
RDF-Syntax went to REC, so technically, they're to blame; however, it
is unfortunately that the last-minute change robbed RDF of the chance
of having two very highly-visible and heavily-used conformant
implementations.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|