[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 06:41:51 -0400 (EDT)
Ann Navarro writes:
> At 06:18 AM 9/17/99 -0400, David Megginson wrote:
> >Ann Navarro writes:
> >
> > > It's assertions like this that honestly confuse me. WWW content,rendered on
> > > today's HTML browsers, cares not a whit about namespaces, so how does
> > > having 3 complicate your life more than 1?
> >
> >I and others have pointed out several times that this assertion is not
> >true -- I know for certain that version 5 of Internet Explorer does
> >use Namespaces, and I think that Mozilla does as well.
>
> For HTML.
That's tautological -- since there isn't a standard Namespace for
HTML, browsers can hardly use a standard HTML Namespace. The proof of
the success (and necessity) of Namespaces is that browsers are using
Namespaces for lots of other stuff now, and they they are using
Namespaces to disambiguate everything else *from* HTML in an HTML
document.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
