[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
- To: Marc.McDonald@Design-Intelligence.com, ricko@allette.com.au, xml-dev@ic.ac.uk, timbl@w3.org
- Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 21:09:05 -0400
At 05:58 PM 9/17/99 -0700, Marc.McDonald@Design-Intelligence.com wrote:
>
>> At 03:24 PM 9/17/99 -0700, Marc.McDonald@Design-Intelligence.com wrote:
>>
>> >. In particular, why should XHTML
>> >go off and decide a mechanism to solve a problem which is a general XML
>> >problem and is being worked on by the schema group?
>>
>> We didn't decide someone else's problem. We took a work in progress and
>> used it as the basis of *one* aspect (out of several) for our decision on
>> the namespace issue.
>>
>> Ann
>>
>> But that is jumping the gun - part of a work in progress is in a proposed
>> recommendation.
The key phrase in there is "one aspect" -- and we're still not *using*
schemas, we're addressing the possibility that this may happen, as well as
dealing with the other use cases described in Steven's message.
Ann
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
