[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 09:56:11 -0400 (EDT)
Steven R. Newcomb writes:
> [Tim Bray:]
>
> > Namespaces are a facility to make names universal, no more, no
> > less.
>
> They don't accomplish that goal. Now that we've done away with the
> requirement that there be a DTD, surprise! we still need models.
!!!
No, they *do* accomplish that goal -- people have raised reasonable
concerns about the persistence of Namespace-qualified names
(especially with URLs), but no one has yet introduced a credible
argument that Namespace-qualifed names are not universal.
Rather, Steve is arguing that universal names should not be an end in
themselves -- and that's a very reasonable argument -- but that hardly
disproves the claim that Namespace-qualified names are
universally-distinguishable.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|