[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Tim McCune <timm@channelpoint.com>
- To: "'James Tauber'" <jtauber@jtauber.com>, XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 10:00:19 -0600
<flame-protect>
I think that the key phrase there is "too many people". You'll probably
offend those poor unfortunate folks who are using Mac's, Microsoft's JVM,
and other obscure environments, but with solid versions of 1.2 available on
Solaris, Linux, and Windows, that probably takes care of 90% of the people
who want to use FOP.
</flame-protect>
-----Original Message-----
From: James Tauber [mailto:jtauber@jtauber.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 1999 7:21 PM
To: XML-Dev Mailing list
Subject: should FOP require JDK1.2.x?
I'd be interested in hearing people's views on the simple question: should
FOP (my XSL formatter/renderer) require JDK1.2.x? At present it works with
1.1.x.
What are other XML developers doing? Should I stick to 1.1.x compatibility?
Or can I require 1.2.x without offending too many people?
James
--
James Tauber / jtauber@jtauber.com / www.jtauber.com
Maintainer of : www.xmlinfo.com, www.xmlsoftware.com and www.schema.net
<pipe>Ceci n'est pas une pipe</pipe>
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN
981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following
message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
