[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Steven Livingstone, ITS, SENM" <steven.livingstone@scotent.co.uk>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 16:36:28 +0100
Not sure if I miss the point , but why not XDR + XSLT so that whether it was
marked as an element or attribute it wouldn't matter in the end?
This would also allow mapping between two differently structured, but
similar objects or classes.
Steven
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Winer [SMTP:dave@userland.com]
> Sent: 20 September 1999 22:23
> To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
> Subject: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC
>
> Ever since discussions on XML-RPC started, the question of how to use
> attributes, or if to use them at all, has been a constant source of
> debate.
> Tim Lundeen of WebCrossing has pitched hard on the use of attributes, and
> I
> have responded in a public mini-essay here:
>
> http://www.xmlrpc.com/discuss/msgReader$506
>
> Till now, I hadn't had a chance yet to write about this, so far all the
> discussions have been less formal. If you have feedback or suggestions,
> they
> would be welcome.
>
> Dave
>
>
> xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
> Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on
> CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
> To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
> (un)subscribe xml-dev
> To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following
> message;
> subscribe xml-dev-digest
> List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
