Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "Mark D. Anderson" <email@example.com>
- To: Tim Bray <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 21:04:20 -0700
I don't know if that was a request for comments or not, but....
the document seems a little loose about distinguishing:
- the problem of how to associate/identify a related resource
from within another (linking)
- the problem of determining what related resources exist for
a given document (perhaps scoped by type), when that given document
does not have embedded/inlined information (discovery)
- the problem of how to map through a level of naming indirection,
whereby there is a known relation to a name but not to an explicitly
identified location (resolution)
The first seems easily solvable by a standardization from among the
plethora of existing mechanisms.
The last seems solvable, and there are already a variety of proposals
(rfc2169, draft-ietf-urn-dns-rds-01.txt, cowan's "XML Catalog", etc..),
but it seems vulnerable to commercial stonewalling.
The second seems both technically hard and vulnerable to commercial
politics, so i'm not hopeful.
--On Monday, September 27, 1999 1:35 PM -0700 Tim Bray <email@example.com> wrote:
> I (and I think some other people) are becoming increasingly convinced
> that the need for some sort of an "XML Packaging" facility is becoming
> increasingly urgent. I was asked to write up a motivating statement for
> the XML Plenary meeting that is happening this Wednesday. I thought that
> the xml-deviants might also find it of interest.
> It's at http://www.textuality.com/xml/why-pkg.html -Tim
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)