Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: David Brownell <email@example.com>
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 11:14:49 -0700
Erik James Freed wrote:
> Clearly we need performance tests to go along with Dave Brownell's fine
> conformance tests!
Yep -- but far better than the only one I saw (the February Java Report)
which benchmarked only the DOM getElementsByTagName() method, and which had
a notable set of serious factual and methodological flaws.
SAX and DOM performance should be separately weighed, and balanced against
conformance. As they say, it's easy to be fast if you don't do it right!
As I recall, xml.com had an article looking at some performance comparisons
(C, Java, Python) a while back.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)