[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- To: "'xml-dev@ic.ac.uk'" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 10:55:19 -0600
"Eve L. Maler" wrote:
>
> When people talk about RDF, the "meta" part is what I have trouble with in
> general. In what way is markup not metadata? In what way are element
> content and attribute values not also metadata (depending on what you do
> with them)? It feels weird for one particular data model to claim to have
> cornered the metadata market.
Here are definitions I use that are mostly free of the ambiguity people
typically associate with the words content and metadata. Metadata is
property/value oriented so that you can ask questions in terms of "what
is the value of this property". Content is list within list oriented so
that you can ask: "what comes before this item, and what comes after
it."
RDF data is content if you look at the XML level (because the XML data
model doesn't make the <TITLE> element addressable as a property) but it
is metadata if you look at the RDF level (because RDF really WOULD make
the <TITLE> element addressable as a TITLE property).
--
Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for himself
"I always wanted to be somebody, but I should have been more
specific." --Lily Tomlin
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|