[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- To: XMLDev list <xml-dev-digest@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 16:38:11 -0500 (EST)
Here are some of the differences between the SAX/Java interfaces and the
SAX/C++ interfaces:
- lots of const
- C++ const char * for Java String throughout (and, thus, UTF-8
instead of UTF-16)
- InputSource doesn't have an equivalent of Java Reader (no getReader
method)
- SAXException does not allow an embedded exception, because there's
no need to tunnel exceptions in C++ (you can always throw any
exception)
- DocumentHandler::characters and DocumentHandler::ignorableWhitespace
don't need the 'start' argument, since they can be passed a pointer
to the start position in an existing array (that's not possible in
Java)
- HandlerBase omitted, since the classes can contain their own default
implementations
- I haven't figured out what to do with Parser::setLocale yet
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|