[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Matthew Gertner <matthew@praxis.cz>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Fri, 03 Dec 1999 10:35:53 +0100
Gabe Beged-Dov wrote:
<snip>
> XLink doesn't even allow you to use a namespace qualified name for the "role" (this may have
> been fixed but it will be done as a new attribute value type like qname). It certainly
> doesn't touch being able to specify a type for the property value. The XML Schema group may
> end up supporting strongly typed references but I wouldn't be surprised if this fell off the
> plate.
This is really exactly what I am trying to get across. A tremendous
amount of effort is being invested in RDF, on various levels (specing,
implementation, evangelism, etc.). This shouldn't cause XML schemas to
be poorer! I may be standing alone here (am I?), but to me it would be a
minor tragedy if XML schemas did not support strongly typed links at the
schema level.
Matthew
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
