[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: 03 Dec 1999 12:38:02 +0100
>>>>> James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>:
> One interesting issue is whether to provide a virtual destructor. I
> think the safest solution is not to provide a virtual destructor but
> instead to declare but not define a private operator delete. This
> makes it a compile time error to do:
> DTDHandler *p;
> // ...
> delete p;
Hm... not defining a virtual destructor for a class with virtual
functions gives me warnings in "gcc -Wall". Will a private operator
delete do anything about these warnings, I wonder...?
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
