[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Matthew Gertner <matthew@praxis.cz>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Fri, 03 Dec 1999 18:39:04 +0100
James Tauber wrote:
>
> > Yes and no. A schema-less XML document is absolutely fine for most
> > things. If you need object semantics then you need a schema.
>
> But a schema doesn't tell you the semantics (although certain schema
> languages might tell you how certain element types relate to others).
I posted a mail early today entitled "Web Vision". It explains more
clearly what I have in mind. It is a relatively new idea but I feel that
it is possible to pack a lot of useful semantics into a schema.
Matthew
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
