[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Lauren Wood" <lauren@sqwest.bc.ca>
- To: "'xml-dev@ic.ac.uk'" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 1999 11:28:41 -0800
On 3 Dec 99, at 12:14, Arnold, Curt wrote:
> It looks like the XML Schema group is trying to add back the & construct.
> If you have a compelling justification for continued suppression, please
> rant long and loud.
How about every SGML parser author I've talked to says the &
construct was the biggest, hardest part (which means probably the
buggiest) of the entire parser? I think the XML WG was right in
throwing it out of XML in the first place.
Lauren
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
