[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Sun, 05 Dec 1999 13:59:41 -0500
Is this not precisely the reason that 'behaviour' (or whatever we are eventually to call it)
of XLinks is indispensable? Not as a replacement for the document-centric assumptions that
text order is meaningful or that the implicit parent-child relationship of element containment
is significant, but as the mechanism for specifying (granted, to a perhaps more data-oriented
audience) either where these relationships should be explicit, or where they are replaced by
explicitly presented alternatives.
Respectfully,
Walter Perry
Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> Perhaps a major part of the problem is that sometimes the document order
> is meaningful and other times just an artifact of there being no "&"
> connector in XML content models, and there is no way to decide. And
> when the order is important, there is no way to label what its
> significance is; indeed, the same thing is true of every axis including
> the children and parent axes.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
