[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com
- To: Vilya Harvey <vilya@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 06 Dec 1999 08:10:29 -0700
> Just a thought: why not take a leaf out of the DOM's book and write the
> canonical version of the SAX interfaces in a language-neutral format like
> IDL? That way, bindings to a number of languages (including, but not
> limited to, C++ and Java) can be trivially derived by using the
> appropriate IDL-to-whatever converter.
Shh! That's unwelcome talk around here.
I advocated using IDL for the official SAX definition a while back, but no-one
seemed to deem it worth considering. Of course, we've fallen into exactly the
sort of trap that language-specific interface definition causes: people
translating to another language all do it differently, and the whole set of
discussions must reiterate for language Y.
The Python/XML group recently hashed out details of of a Python/DOM binding.
Because there is a developed Python/CORBA binding, we knew exactly how to
model several key components of the interface. Note that this does not
involve taking up _any_ of CORBA's baggage except for interface definition,
for which IDL does a brilliant job.
--
Uche Ogbuji
FourThought LLC, IT Consultants
uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com (970)481-0805
Software engineering, project management, Intranets and Extranets
http://FourThought.com http://OpenTechnology.org
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
