[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: 08 Dec 1999 09:12:46 +0100
>>>>> roddey@us.ibm.com:
This statement:
> ... If it were up to me, I'd say use every modern service of C++ and
> those who don't have compliant C++ implementation can have a good reason to
> get one.
[...]
conflicts with this statement:
> 2) We would prefer that all data come out of the SAX interfaces as
> raw wchar_t strings. This is the most flexible mechanism and does
> not lock people into using any particular implementation of a string
> object. It also has the highest potential performance for those
> folks who never need to put it into anything more formal than a raw
> array.
std::basic_string<> _is_ a modern service of C++, and a pretty good
one from an API point of view.
Personally I say: use std::basic_string<> and death to all other
string representations in C++.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
