[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Clark C. Evans" <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
- To: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 03:03:21 -0500 (EST)
On 10 Dec 1999, David Megginson wrote:
> No, these would both be non-conformant -- the XML spec defines a
> document as the main production, and a parser that encounters a second
> root element in what is being given to it as a document simply has to
> stop processing, except for error reporting.
Yes. But I thought the computational model for XML was
a hedge-automata? (not a tree-automata... )
Clark
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
