[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Don Park" <donpark@docuverse.com>
- To: <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 08:50:19 -0800
My thanks to everyone who contributed to this thread.
Some of you thought I am proposing removal of namespace.
I am not. What I am doing is trying to see what lies
beyond our technical concerns. I do not accept that
the current standardization practice is the best one,
just better than before, and I believe we focus too
much on logic and not enough on the big picture, the
one that astronauts see when they look at Earth from
out of space.
I think the real question I am asking is: What if we
were coerced into proactive standardization? What
do we lose and what do we gain?
The registry/dictionary I mentioned is a form of
coercion. Appropriate amount of anarchy can be
introduced with distributed architecture similar
to DNS. XML-DEV old timers might recognize that
this distributed name registry network is similar
to the TagNet idea I wrote briefly about two years
ago. Looks like I am going around in circles. <g>
Don Park - mailto:donpark@docuverse.com
Docuverse - http://www.docuverse.com
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
