[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- To: <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: 15 Dec 1999 15:19:07 -0500
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@virgin.net> writes:
> The justification would appear real,
> the solution to that 'real' problem would
> seem flawed. 'just that no one has bettered it...
> yet.
Well, we have years of very positive experience with namespaces in
programming languages like Java and Perl. It's possible that our
experience in programming languages doesn't apply to XML, but I'd like
to hear a clear argument of why it doesn't.
As I mentioned in a previous posting, I'd hate to have to write Perl
modules without packages.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
