[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- To: "Hill, Les" <lhill@excelergy.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 16:14:24 -0500 (EST)
Hill, Les writes:
> How could the first work without the expanded signature of the second?
> Imagine the following:
>
> <f:bar xmlns:f="foo" xmlns:b="baz" b:y="z">
> </f:bar>
>
> resulting in:
>
> startNamespace("foo")
> startNamespace("baz")
> startElement("bar", atts)
>
> which namespace is "bar" in?
That's a separate question -- the idea of the original suggestion is
that NamespaceContext would not be nested -- in the worst case, there
would have to be start/endNamespaceContext events for every element.
This is separate from the question of reporting the scope of Namespace
declarations.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
