[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: 20 Dec 1999 16:29:16 -0500
Joe Lapp <jlapp@webMethods.com> writes:
> Using Java String interning, how do you guys guarantee performance
> in any of the DOM Element get*() methods that take Strings? Do you
> require that the app intern the string before passing it in? Do you
> try to make the methods smart so that if they're interned, you get
> performance, and if they aren't, you get a bit more of a penalty
> (for having done the intern check first)? Do you make them dumb so
> that if you forgot to intern, you don't get anything? Or would one
> always intern these externally provided Strings within the method?
With the DOM, I think, the biggest issue is not performance but memory
usage -- you do not want 500 separate "div2" strings floating around
in the same tree. Interning is much more obviously essential for a
tree API than it is for a streaming API.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|