[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Hunter, David" <dhunter@Mobility.com>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 17:02:23 -0500
From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@textuality.com]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 1999 4:45 PM
>
> That is equivalent to asserting that
>
> <html:a html:href="foo"> and
> <html:a href="foo">
>
> must always in all languages and in all applications be considered
> identical. Which is not an unreasonable viewpoint. But the WG at
> the time, after lengthy consideration, couldn't swallow it. -Tim
But it seems to be a fundamental point of view of the specs coming out of
the W3C, implied or otherwise. Take XSLT, for example. If I declare a
stylesheet, I do it like this:
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0"
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<!--other stuff-->
</xsl:stylesheet>
Notice that there is no explicit namespace declared for the version
attribute, it's just assumed to be the same as the <stylesheet> element.
But, there is also a shorthand we can use for stylesheets with one template
that matches against "/", so I could do something like this:
<html xsl:version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<!--other stuff-->
</html>
in which case I *have* to declare the namespace of version explicitly.
Are there any specs coming out of the W3C that *don't* assume that
<whatever:element version="1.0" xmlns:whatever="whatever">
is identical to
<whatever:element whatever:version="1.0" xmlns:whatever="whatever">
?
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
